#Sales Offer!| Get upto 25% Off:

Discussion: Unit 6, Due Wednesday by 11:59 pm CT
Palliative Care
Instructions:

Please complete the following steps for your discussion post and response.
Reference below article to aid in forming your discussion:

Norman, K. (2016). Live and let die: The consequences of Oklahoma’s nondiscrimination in treatment act. Oklahoma Law Review 68(3). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1028&context=olr

Glenn Ross, a 55-year-old man living in Oklahoma, was diagnosed with inoperable pancreatic cancer. His prognosis was poor; he was given about six months to live. He underwent several series of chemotherapy treatments, but they were of no benefit. He continued to lose weight, suffered from nausea, and became weaker. After three months of chemotherapy treatments, he stated that he wanted no further treatment. He became bedridden and was admitted into a nursing home for terminal care. Glenn’s son, who lived in another state, arrived at the nursing home and demanded that his father’s physician be called immediately. The son wanted his father to be hospitalized and placed on chemotherapy immediately. When the physician explained that there was little hope for the father’s recovery, the son threatened to sue the physician for withdrawal of care.

As the manager of Glenn’s palliative care facility, you are responsible for helping Glenn’s physician navigate the appropriate legal and ethical course of action. Answer the following questions in your discussion post:
Identify the ethical issues in the scenario described.
Does the son have a legitimate reason to sue the physician? Why or why not? Support your opinion with research and cite relevant laws and regulations that support or discredit his statement.
What are the possible solutions to this scenario? Describe the outcomes that would provide a win-win situation.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

The post and responses are valued at 40 points. Please review post and response expectations. Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets criteria.

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
Peer Responses: Unit 6, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT
Palliative Care
Instructions:

Please post 2 peer responses.
In the response post, include the following:
Review your classmate’s assessment of questions 1, 2, and 3. Offer feedback (opposing views are welcomed and respected).
Summarize and cite one source that either supports or provides contrast to your classmate’s post. This source should focus on the legal or ethical aspect of the case (or both, if desired).

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Found something interesting ?

• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level professional writers
• Free Plagiarism Report

• 100% money-back guarantee
• Absolute Privacy & Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

Grab your Discount!

25% Coupon Code: SAVE25
get 25% !!