Content

(50%)

The report includes :

·        concise, clear introduction, all components included

·        concise, clear and relevant summary of video clip and detailed observations

·        in-depth, substantial, clear and relevant discussion of issues in the analysis

·        the analysis is comprehensively supported by academic sources

·        examples from the chosen video clip are extremely well selected and thoroughly integrated into the analysis

·        Highly appropriate recommendations; clearly related to the analysis

·        clear, summative conclusion

50  49  48  47  46  45 44 43       

The report includes:

·        clear introduction, all components included

·        clear and relevant summary of scenario and observations

·        thoughtful, clear and relevant discussion of issues in the analysis

·        the analysis is well supported by academic sources

·        examples from the chosen video clip are well selected and integrated into the analysis

·        appropriate recommendations; related to the analysis

·        clear conclusion

42   41   40   39   38 

The report includes

·     mostly clear introduction, most components included

·     mostly clear and relevant summary of  scenario and some observations

·     mostly clear, relevant, and  well-supported outline of issues in the analysis

·     the analysis is quite well supported by academic sources

·     examples from the chosen video clip are integrated into the analysis.

·     appropriate recommendations; could be better related to the analysis

·     mostly clear conclusion

37   36    35   34   33      

·     The report includes most of the required sections, but some of these are not adequately completed or supported

·     The report seems fragmented, or difficult to understand the relationships between each section.

·     Academic sources are only occasionally integrated in the report.

·     There may be some irrelevant information.

·     The analysis needs to be developed

·     Recommendations could be more appropriate and related to the scenario.

·     Conclusion is poorly related to items  in the report

32   31   30   29   28   27  26     

·     Some required sections of the report are missing, not completed, or not appropriately supported

·     It is unclear how the sections of the report relate to each other

·     There is almost no reference to academic sources.

·     Reference list is missing

·     There is little or no analysis of the video and safe spaces

·     There may be some irrelevant information.

·     No or irrelevant recommendations are made

·     No conclusion included

25  21   17  13 9   5   0

Organisation

(20%)

·      Content logically and cohesively developed through the summary and observations, analysis, and recommendation sections.

·      Content type highly appropriate for each section.

·      No unnecessary repetition.

20  19  18  17

·      Content logically developed through the summary and observations, analysis, and recommendation sections.

·      Content type appropriate for each section.

·      Very little unnecessary repetition.

16  15

·      The organisation is logical. However some areas need further development.

·      Content type mostly appropriate for each section.

·      There is some unnecessary  repetition

14   13

·      Organisation is generally clear but lacks cohesion which makes the ideas difficult to follow.

·      Content type is sometimes inappropriate for each section

·      Considerable unnecessary repetition between sections.

12  10

·      There is little cohesion between different sections.

·      Content type is often inappropriate for each section.

·      Unnecessary repetition of ideas is frequent.

9     7      5     3

Word choice, Punctuation, grammar and spelling

(10%)

10   9.5   9  8.5

8   7.5

7    6.5

6   5

4   3   2

Presentation

(5%)

·      Student name, student number and page numbers in footer.

·      Title of assessment in header.

·      Assignment file name saved with correct labelling format as per the assignment instructions

5  4.5

·      Student name, student number, title of assessments and page numbers are in header and/or footer.

·      Name, unit, assign number details in the assignment file name.

4

·      Student and assessment identification and page numbers are in headers and footers, but identification not complete.

·      Some identification included in file name but not all components.

3.5

·      Student identification and title of assessment are partly in headers and footers but much information missing.

·      File not submitted in the requested format (.doc) for marking.

·      Identification missing in file name.

3  2.5

·      Significant number of formatting errors.

·      Student identification and title of assessment are not in headers and footers.

2   1

Reference

(15%)

·      In-text citation used accurately according to the APA Style Guide.

·      The report consistently and accurately uses APA 6th referencing style for video and images.

·      Contents of the reference list accurately reflect the sources used in the report.

·      Reference list formatted accurately according to the APA Style Guide.

15  14  13

·      In-text citation mostly used accurately according to the APA Style Guide. One or two errors are present.

·      There is mostly accurate use of APA 6th referencing style for video and images.

·       Contents of the reference list mostly reflect the sources used in the report.

·      Reference list mostly formatted accurately according to the APA Style Guide. One or two errors present.

12.5  12  11.5

·      An attempt has been made to use in-text citation according to the APA Style Guide. Some errors are present.

·      Use of APA 6th referencing style for video and images has been attempted. However some errors present.

·      Contents of the reference list reflect the sources used in the report, but some discrepancies are present.

·      Reference list partly formatted according to the APA Style Guide, but some errors present.

11   10.5   10

·      An attempt to use APA 6th referencing style for in-text citations, but many errors or absences.

·      Use of APA 6th referencing style for video and images has been attempted. However many errors present.

·      Reference list and contents of the report only match up partially. Many discrepancies present.

·      APA 6th referencing style has been used to format the reference list, but many errors present.

9   8.5    8   7.5

·      Very inaccurate use of referencing, or a complete absence of referencing.

7   6   5   4   3   2   1   0

Comments

Total: