Details:
Write a paper of 1,200 words that discusses the team-based approaches to the delivery of health services. The focus of the paper should be one type of health care environment, such a long-term care facility.
Within your paper, be sure to do the following:
- Present a patient case (this does not need to be detailed).
- Describe the team that would deliver care and their individual roles.
- Identify and describe the indicators and determinants of health that would influence or impact this case.
- Describe the impact this team-based approach would have on management and line staff.
- Provide an analysis of key financial and resource savings for consumers and insurance companies as they apply to this model.
- From a leadership position, explain the advantages of using a team-based approach.
Your paper should contain the following parts:
- Introduction
- Body paragraphs (Possible headings include: Case Description, Health Care Delivery Team, Indicators and Determinants of Health, Financial and Resource Analysis, Team-Based Approach Advantages.)
- Conclusion
Revise your paper using suggestions from the peer reviewer.
Use the Library to find at least two peer-reviewed sources.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines.
Rubrics
Health Care Delivery Paper
| 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% |
3 Satisfactory 75.00% |
4 Good 85.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
||
| 80.0 %Content | ||||||
| 20.0 %Criteria | Description of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. | Ignores or superficially describes the criteria. Draws unwarranted or erroneous conclusions. | Surface-level description of criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported. | Description is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria. | Thoroughly describes major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, accurate conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate. | |
| 40.0 %Analysis | Analysis of the criteria is not outlined or outlined poorly. | Ignores or superficially evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or erroneous conclusions. | Surface-level evaluation of criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported. | Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the criteria. | Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, accurate conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate. | |
| 20.0 %Content Comprehension | Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. | Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. | Content is complete but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. | Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. | Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Definitions are clearly stated. | |
| 10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
| 10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) | Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. | Some distracting inconsistencies in language and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. | Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. | The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. | The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. | |
| 10.0 %Format | ||||||
| 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
| 5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting are appropriate to assignment and APA style) | No reference page is included. No citations are used. | |||||
