Your Project Plan and Search Strategy.

.What is your proposed project? How are you going to find out what is already known about this topic, or what has been done before?
Briefly explain the topic for your proposed project . Your project could be a clinical audit, a leadership program, or a learning and teaching program..plz note.(In this regard I have chosen to do my project as a CLINICAL AUDIT).and my topic of my proposed project is:
DO NURSES IN AN ACUTE SURGICAL WARD IN XXX HOSPITAL UTILISE THE BEST HAND HYGIENE PRACTICES WHILE DELIVERING CARE TO THE PATIENTS)

Next, provide at least four suggested keywords or phrases for your literature search.
Finally, discuss your ideas for a search strategy. For example, you might want to identify key journals or relevant databases applicable to your topic, or list some key websites that are integral to this topic. Justify your decisions for which sites or journals you include.
Prepare your submission as a word document..

marking criteria.
CRITERIA

Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Good (60 – 69%) Fair (50 – 59%) Poor (<50%) MARK
Project topic

(15% of total mark)
? Appropriate topic, which doesn’t require ethics approval, with excellent explanation.

(13-15 marks)
? Appropriate topic, which doesn’t require ethics approval, explained clearly.

(11-12 marks)
? Appropriate topic, which doesn’t require ethics approval.

(9-10 marks)
? Fair explanation of project topic which does not require ethics approval.

(7-8 marks)
? Poor or missing explanation of project topic ? Topic requires ethical approval (< 7 marks)

/15
Key words or phrases

(25% of total mark)
? Appropriate keywords or phrases, perfectly relevant for the given topic.

(21-25 marks)
? Appropriate keywords or phrases, relevant for the given topic.

(18-20 marks)
? Keywords or phrases proposed, mostly relevant for the given topic.

(15-17 marks)
? Fair attempt at proposing relevant keywords or phrases.

(13-14 marks)
? Poor or missing keywords or phrases.

(<12 marks)

/25
Search strategy

(50% of total mark)
? Excellent description / explanation of proposed search strategy, and strong justification of key journals, databases or websites to be included in search strategy

(40-50 marks)
? Very good description / explanation of proposed search strategy, and good justification of key journals, databases or websites to be included in search strategy

(35-39 marks)
? Good description / explanation of proposed search strategy, and good attempt at justification of key journals, databases or websites to be included in search strategy

(30-34 marks)
? Fair description / explanation of proposed search strategy, but little or no attempt at justification of key journals, databases or websites to be included in the search strategy

(25-29 marks)
? Poor of missing search strategy, with little or no attempt at listing key journals, databases or websites to include in the search strategy.

(< 25 marks)

/50
Writing and referencing

(10% of total mark)
? Excellent use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing used throughout. Excellent grammar and spelling.

(8-10 marks)
? Very good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing, and good grammar and spelling.

(7 marks)
? Good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature

(6 marks)
? Good use of relevant sources of literature. Mostly correct referencing. Some grammar and spelling errors.

(5 marks)
? Few if any literature sources included and poor referencing. Poor spelling and grammar.