Assignment Front Sheet |
|||||
Code | Module title |
Level |
Course Leader |
Student Number |
Student Name |
6MA012 |
Human Factors |
6 |
|
Assessment Title: Human Factors Coursework |
Date Issued: November, 2019 |
Assignment Deadline: See Assignment brief |
Date of Received Submission: |
Task |
L.O. Code |
Learning Outcome Criteria |
|||
CW & Exam |
1 |
Critically apply knowledge of the principles of Human Factors through the systematic investigation of complex issues to produce safe, efficient and cost-effective solutions in the aviation/aerospace industry | |||
CW & Exam |
2 |
Apply Human Factors theories to practical case studies in which aviation-related scenarios are analysed | |||
CW & Exam |
3 |
Critically evaluate research findings and theories in the area of Aviation Human Factors | |||
CW & Exam |
4 |
Demonstrate the skills and qualities required of a Human Factors professional (e.g. demonstration of ethical and legal considerations; critical reflection and personal responsibility) in the safety-critical aviation environment | |||
|
|
||||
I verify that this is all my own work and that I have had sufficient guidance to complete this examination. |
Student signature:
|
||||
Assignment Title: Human Factors Coursework
Additional information; |
Please ensure you print & attach in front of this page the eVision ‘bar code’ sheet to receive a submission receipt
|
Assignment Front Sheet |
|||||||
Code | Module title |
Level |
Module Tutor |
Course Leader |
Student Number |
Student Name |
|
6MA012 |
Human Factors |
6 |
John Chorley |
Dr David Adebayo |
|||
Assessment Title: Human Factors Coursework |
Type of assessment -please tick |
Assignment
|
Assessors feedback (RED INK ONLY)
|
|
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Assignment Front Sheet |
|||||
Code | Module title |
Level |
Course Leader |
Student Number |
Student Name |
6MA012 |
Human Factors |
6 |
Dr David Adebayo |
Assessment Title: Human Factors Coursework |
Internal Verifier: |
Grading decisions appropriate | Y | N |
Assessors decision confirmed | Y | N |
Appropriate feedback given | Y | N |
Grading Verification
Verifiers feedback (GREEN INK ONLY)
|
Internal Verifier stamp / date/ signature
|
Module Descriptor; See VLE
Marks
- The assignment will be marked on the work given in but if the mark achieved is below a pass the work will not be returned for additions or amendments and the grade achieved will be submitted to the exam board (in-line with University of Wolverhampton regulations). If the work is not handed in by the due date it will be considered a zero grade (fail & repeat).
- Assignment extensions cannot be granted without accompanying mitigating circumstances.
- All course work MUST have the report word count provided at the end of the report.
Guidance
- The report must have a title page, a contents page and a bibliography, each section should be separate with heading or sub heading highlighted in some manner.
- Drawings can be photocopied or downloaded but they must be referenced and have permission from the owner.
- Text must not be downloaded and claimed as students own; however referenced or cited work is acceptable.
- Loose sheets of paper will not be accepted under any circumstances – the report should be stapled together with the front covers appended to the front of the work to be marked.
- The report must be entirely word processed.
- The report will only be accepted once signed by the student to verify it is their work
Late submission of coursework
- Where work is submitted late it will receive a mark of 0%, (fail & repeat).
Plagiarism
- Plagiarism is completely unacceptable and is dealt with very severely. To avoid plagiarism you must be sure you understand what plagiarism is, and how to avoid it.
- The importance of correctly acknowledging the work of others cannot be over-emphasised. It is absolutely essential that specific, detailed references are provided locally within your work for each and every extract you take from work that is not your own.
- A general reference at the end of a report to a source from which you have extracted text items is not
- The use of italics and/or inverted commas to highlight text extracts which are not your own original work is a simple way of demonstrating honesty in your work. Each text extract you use should be individually linked to a numbered list of specific references provided at the end of your work.
- For further information, see the information on the Universities regulations.
Human Factors (6MA012)
Assignment Brief
Weighting: 50%
Issue Date: November, 2019
Submission Requirements
- All learning outcomes relevant to this portfolio as specified in the module description must be satisfied.
- The assignment should be written as a formal report (2000 words maximum excluding figures, tables and any other formal documentation such as AAIB, NTSB, and HFACS etc., and other accident reports, diagrams and illustrations, which should be included as appendices) and this must all be word processed and electronically submitted in MS Word to CANVAS.
- Your report, including any other attachment must both be submitted as single files. Do not split your report, bibliography or appendix into separate documents.
- If you have hand written work such as calculations or sketches, these can be scanned and incorporated in a PDF for submission.
- Where work is submitted late it will receive a mark of 0%, (fail & repeat).
- Assignment extensions cannot be granted without accompanying mitigating circumstances.
- Ensure that your report is clear and coherent with good visual figures.
- All sources must be well referenced and figures captioned.
- Any other accident reports, diagrams and illustrations, can be included as appendices.
The Brief
Cabin crew and passengers remain at the heart of aviation safety, as such, the need for careful consideration of Human Factors continues to increase. The Aviation Industry requires a strong commitment to and understanding of human performance issues in addition to engineering excellence to meet the safety performance and business requirements of all stakeholders. Therefore, as an aerospace engineer, it is expedient to have an in-depth understanding of the aerospace industry requirements to ensure safety, efficient performance, and cost reduction through the application of Human Factors in Aviation skills and knowledge.
In order to carry out this assignment, you first need to conduct a thorough research into Human Factors related issues in regards to the aerospace industry. This report will assess your application of knowledge and skills within the aerospace industry, your personal reflections, as well as your ability to relate and translate theoretical concepts into a real life situation. Select any ONE of the following titles for your research and coursework.
1 | Critically evaluate the impact of Human Factors within a series of aviation/aerospace/space related incidents with particular reference to the concept of the ‘dirty dozen’ as identified by ‘Gordon Dupont, (Maintenance And Ramp Safety Society (MARSS) Canada 1993). |
2 | Examine at least four case studies provided by aircraft accident investigation organisations and explain how Reason’s (1990) ‘Swiss Cheese model’ can be applied to identify the main contributory factor(s) in causing safety critical incidents. Critically examine the shortcomings of Reason’s original concept and make suggestions how the model could be (and has been) developed further. |
3 | As space travel is opened up to commercial operations, critically examine the impact that Human factors concepts may have on profit making organisations, using case studies to illustrate some of the challenges that they might face. |
4 | Using recognised Human Factor models, critically analyse at least four case studies to illustrate how maintenance errors have influenced the flight safety of aircraft and contributed to the development of the concept of a ‘no blame’ culture. |
5 | Critically examine the work of Air Accident Investigation reports from at least two major sources, using at least four case studies and analyse the way that they have influenced the development of Crew resource management (CRM) since 1945. |
6 | Critically examine and evaluate the safety record of at least two different aircraft types and explore the way the design features, combined with Human factor issues have played a major impact on safety critical incidents. |
7 | Critically describe and analyse the ways in which Human Factors related models can improve Aircraft Maintenance safety, providing examples from at least five researched case studies. |
8 | In what ways have the move to more automated flight systems impacted on Human Factors and CRM in new generation passenger aircraft? Provide at least two case studies to illustrate your critical analysis. |
9 | Critically analyse challenges associated with the practical application of the currently available safety tools associated with Human Factor models, exploring what can be identified as current strategies to enhance understanding and management of maintenance errors. |
10 | Compare and contrast the way in which The TEM (Threat Error Management) model involving Latent and Active errors contribute to aviation incidents that have been formally reported during the past fifteen years. Using case studies, critically analyse the way in which such incidents could have been mitigated by Threat Error Management. |