#Sales Offer!| Get upto 25% Off:

February 15, 2020

For this paper, you will discuss your results for the following assessments:

For this paper, you will discuss your results for the following assessments:

Myers Briggs Type Indicator (personality)
RIASEC/Career Interest Profiler (interests)
Career Values
Skills/Abilities

In your discussion, please include the following content:

What were your results for each assessment and what did you learn about yourself? What did you find interesting (i.e. were you surprised by your results)?
Compare and contrast test results. Do you find that the results are similar/dissimilar? How do your personality characteristics, interests, values, and skills relate to each other?
Describe the characteristics of your ideal career that you would apply to now. Be realistic and specific when considering your career options in the near future (i.e. HR Rep/Campus Recruiter–NOT CEO or HR Manager unless you have qualified experiences). Is this potentially a good and bad career fit for you based on your results?
What are the strengths and weaknesses associated with your assessment results (i.e. personality type or interest preferences)? How will your strengths benefit you in your career choice? How can you overcome some of the potential limitations associated with your preferences/types?

Please submit your paper as a Word document or PDF and adhere to the following format:

12-point font
Single-spaced
2 Pages in length
1 inch margins
Word document or PDF format
Citations in APA format when necessary (including a reference list if applicable)

Your paper will be graded on the following criteria:

Content (meaningful discussion, addressing major questions posed)
Inclusion of all four assessments
Grammar, spelling, punctuation
Adherence to formatting guidelines

aaea387778cd6276a1363addb6bcf89.png
efb02a4e5356690abf5747f5f7da2d6.png
0cb16131d6d74c049ab4b8b5a59bc73.png
0ddaa67c2d16e278ba03ab0e8e478af.png
006d5b042474b76

Management

Share this :

Found something interesting ?

We don't just promise. Here is what we guarantee!

• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level professional writers
• Free Plagiarism Report

• 100% money-back guarantee
• Absolute Privacy & Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

Related Model Questions

Feel free to peruse our college and university model questions. If any our our assignment tasks interests you, click to place your order. Every paper is written by our professional essay writers from scratch to avoid plagiarism. We guarantee highest quality of work besides delivering your paper on time.

The AB Charity is planning its annual campaign to raise money. This year three alternative methods are being considered: (i) street collections, (ii) a television advertising campaign and (iii) a directmail appeal. After using simulation to assess the risk associated with the alternatives the charity’s managers have opted for a direct-mail appeal. The direct-mail appeal will involve sending out 343 000 letters to selected people. To encourage donation these will include a free ballpoint pen displaying the charity’s logo and people not replying after three weeks will receive a reminder. While the fixed costs of the campaign and the cost of sending out each letter and reminder are known for certain the charity’s managers have had to estimate probability distributions for the following four factors: (a) The percentage of people who will reply to the first letter in the North (N), Central (C) and South (S) regions of the country, respectively. (b) The average donation of those replying to the first letter in each of these regions. (c) The percentage of people who will reply to the reminder in each of the three regions. (d) The average donation of those replying to the reminder in each of the regions. Probability distributions have been estimated for the different regions because their different economic conditions are likely to have a major effect on people’s propensity to donate to the charity. The cumulative probability distribution of net returns (i.e. the total value of donations less the cost of running the direct-mail appeal). It can be seen that there is approximately a 20% probability that the net returns will be negative, causing the charity to lose money. In the simulation the possible losses extended to nearly $150 000. The managers of the charity are keen to take action to reduce this risk, but are not sure where their actions should be directed? The numbers at the ends of the bars show what are thought to be the highest and lowest possible values for each factor. For example, the possible average donation in the North is thought to range from $2 to $17. (a) Identify the areas where risk management is likely to be most effective. (b) Create a set of possible risk management strategies that might reduce the risk of the charity losing money and increase its expected return.

August 20, 2021 3:13 pm

List the worms that causes taeniasis elephantiasis

May 9, 2016 8:19 pm

Summarize Samsung’s successful global strategy for the last decade. Can that strategy be as successful in 2016? Explain.

February 7, 2020 8:12 am