#Sales Offer!| Get upto 25% Off:

You will prepare a report for the CIO of Zurich

Allen, L 2016, IT service management leaps ahead at Zurich https://pinkelephant.co.uk/about/case-studies/service-improvement-zurich/

Section 1: The case study demonstrates that process maturity assessments reported Zurich’s service improvements. Based on the examples in the case study, identify three ITIL processes where improvements can be verified. Discuss the selected ITIL processes and their Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for successful implementation as identified in the case study. (25 marks)
Section 2: The Head of Service Management at the European Centre of Excellence states: “The first step in our [improvement] journey was to understand where we stood today.” Which ITIL service lifecycle can undertake this requirement and how is this typically executed according to ITIL best practices? With references from the case study, give examples of how Zurich executed this service lifecycle. (25 marks)
Section 3: The case study argues that: “process improvement = service improvement”. A strong evidence is provided for this position based on PinkElephant’s consulting journey with Zurich. Identify one reference (case study, academic article, or industry report) that challenges this position, and present at least two key arguments to suggest that “process improvement ≠ service improvement”, i.e. service improvement is more than just process improvement. (25 marks)

 

 

Found something interesting ?

• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level professional writers
• Free Plagiarism Report

• 100% money-back guarantee
• Absolute Privacy & Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

Related Model Questions

Feel free to peruse our college and university model questions. If any our our assignment tasks interests you, click to place your order. Every paper is written by our professional essay writers from scratch to avoid plagiarism. We guarantee highest quality of work besides delivering your paper on time.

In this case, you have been notified by Mr. Hirum Andfirum, Human Resources Director for the Makestuff Company, that the company has just terminated Mr. Got Yourprop, a former engineer in the company’s New Products Division, for cause. Mr. Andfirum tells you that at Mr. Yourprop’s exit interview earlier that day, the terminated employee made several statements to the effect of “it is okay because I have a new job already and they were VERY happy to have me come from Makestuff, with ALL I have to offer.” Mr. Yourprop’s statements made Mr. Andfirum fear he might be taking Makestuff’s intellectual property with him to his new employer (undoubtedly a Makestuff competitor). In particular, Mr. Andfirum is worried about the loss of the source code for “Product X,” which the company is counting on to earn millions in revenue over the next three years. Mr. Andfirum provides you a copy of the source code to use in your investigation. Lastly, Mr. Andfirum tells you to remember that the Company wants to retain the option to refer the investigation to law enforcement in the future, so anything you do should be with thought about later potential admissibility in court. The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” While the 4th Amendment is most commonly interpreted to only affect/restrict governmental power (e.g., law enforcement), the fact that a formal criminal investigation is a possibility (and the Company has no desire to be named in a civil lawsuit) means you must consider its effect your actions

Read More »

Grab your Discount!

25% Coupon Code: SAVE25
get 25% !!