The main reason is that security is expensive to set up and a nuisance to run, so people judge from experience how little of it they can get away with. Since there’s been little damage, people decide that they don’t need much security. In addition, setting it up is so complicated that it’s hardly ever done right. While we await a catastrophe, simpler setup is the most important step toward better security. In a distributed system with no central management like the Internet, security requires a clear story about who is trusted for each step in establishing it, and why. The basic tool for telling this story is the “speaks for” relation between principals that describes how authority is delegated, that is, who trusts whom. The idea is simple, and it explains what’s going on in any system I know. The many different ways of encoding this relation often make it hard to see the underlying order.
Research Paper
Network and Computer Security in Organizations
The majority of abstracts are informative. While they still do not critique or evaluate a work, they do more than describe it. A good informative abstract acts as a surrogate for the work itself. That is, the researcher presents and explains all the main arguments and the important results and evidence in the paper. An informative abstract includes the information that can be found in a descriptive abstract [purpose, methods, scope] but it also includes the results and conclusions of the research and the recommendations of the author. The length varies according to discipline, but an informative abstract is usually no more than 300 words in length. Although it is the first section of your paper, the abstract, by definition, should be written last since it will summarize the contents of your entire paper
Cover Page
Table of Content
(Please learn how to create a professional TOC using Word’s TOC tool WITH PAGE NUMBERS, if you don’t know how.)
Section 1. Background
Section 2. Major causes of these two failures
Section 3. Did the lessons they learned in the 1994 failure help them mitigate the 2013 failure. Why and Why not?
Section 4. Recommendations.
Section 5. References
