This isn’t a paper.  Its just 3 questions.  Just 1 page maybe.  So can I get it tonight?

  • Debate the major challenges (e.g., legal requirements, cheaper manpower, global talent, human resource practices, etc.) that MNCs face when developing performance management processes within countries outside of the United States.
  • From the e-Activity, determine whether the national culture of the chosen country trumps the organizational culture of the chosen MNC, or vice versa. Next, assess the extent to which the selected organization has overcome any of its cultural challenges. Justify your response.
  • E- Activity Go to the Hofstede Centre’s Website, located at http://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html, and select one (1) country of your choosing from the drop-down menu. Review the six (6) cultural dimensions of the selected country. Next, use the Internet to research the organizational culture of one (1) multinational company (MNC) that conducts business within the selected country. Be prepared to discuss.

 

Please use the links below if the first link is inaccessible. You may need to copy and paste the link into the web browser.

https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/

https://www.hofstede-insights.com/models/national-culture/

Found something interesting ?

• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level professional writers
• Free Plagiarism Report

• 100% money-back guarantee
• Absolute Privacy & Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

Related Model Questions

Feel free to peruse our college and university model questions. If any our our assignment tasks interests you, click to place your order. Every paper is written by our professional essay writers from scratch to avoid plagiarism. We guarantee highest quality of work besides delivering your paper on time.

The Superior Product Team was set up as a consortium of contractors, designers and the client to provide completed corridor units that fit inside a structural steel frame. Each prefabricated unit weighed 6.8 tonnes and was 4m long, 7m wide and 2.5m high. The units could be double-stacked or divided into two narrower corridors 3.5m wide (Figure 9.6). Each unit was externally cladded and glazed to provide a finished waterproof product bolted within the onsite in-situ steel frame. The units were complete with modular plug and fix heating, electrical and IT services. The steel frame was standalone and configured to the route of the corridor, which generally linked two buildings. In order to install the units within the frame, rails were fixed to the frame at the height of the floor and units were lifted into the frame by leaving out a section of the top frame structure (Figure 9.7). Units were lowered onto the rails and pushed along them until they met up with the last corridor unit; they were then sealed, bolted together and connected to services. This action was repeated for each corridor unit in both directions up to the access holes in the steel frame. Tolerance was critical, allowing the steel to be slightly out of true longitudinally; however, high tolerances were required on the rail level and the plumb of the structural columns to which the units were bolted top and bottom. Once a corridor was completed between the two buildings, the services could be hooked up, tested and commissioned.

Read More »

Grab your Discount!

25% Coupon Code: SAVE25
get 25% !!