Report Assessment Rubric (Literature review):
| CRITERIA | High Distinction (80-100) | Distinction (70-79) | Credit (60-69) | Pass (50-59) | Fail (0-49) |
| Understanding
(40%) |
Insightful response that reflects a sophisticated interpretation of the literature reviewed. | Response that reflects a good understanding and interpretation of the literature reviewed. | Response that reflects an understanding and interpretation of the literature reviewed. | Satisfactory response that reflects a basic understanding and interpretation of the literature reviewed. | Response is unsatisfactory and does not show an understanding or interpretation of the literature reviewed. |
| Use of evidence
(20%) |
Analysis and evaluation of a range of relevant, reputable scholarly literature is well-integrated to enrich response. | Analysis and evaluation of a range of relevant, reputable scholarly literature is used to support response. | Analysis and evaluation of some relevant, reputable scholarly literature is used to support response. | Reference to relevant, reputable scholarly literature is present but limited. | Reference to relevant, reputable scholarly literature is lacking or not evident. |
| Structure and style
(15%)
|
Logically organised introduction, body and conclusion that flows easily. Sophisticated and complex style appropriate for a literature review. | Clearly organised introduction, body and conclusion that flows well. Style is appropriate for a literature review. | Organised introduction, body and conclusion that generally flows well. Style is generally appropriate for a literature review. | Contains introduction, body and conclusion. Style show a basic understanding of a literature review. | Lacks appropriate structure and flow, and may be difficult to follow. Overall, style is inappropriate for a literature review. |
| Technical skills
(15%)
|
Uses varied and complex sentence structure. Almost error-free punctuation and grammar. A wide-range of highly appropriate vocabulary and discipline-specific terms. | Uses varied sentence structure. Occasional errors in punctuation and grammar. A range of appropriate and accurate discipline-specific vocabulary. | Produces mostly error free sentences. Infrequent errors in spelling and punctuation which do not impede understanding. Uses vocabulary and discipline-specific terms accurately. | Produces sentences with some variety and accuracy. Errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar occasionally impede understanding. Mostly appropriate vocabulary and key discipline-specific terms. | Produces sentences which are repetitive, simplistic, incomplete or run-on. Errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation that interfere with understanding. Limited/inappropriate vocabulary; discipline-specific terms misused/ missing. |
| Referencing
(10%) |
Citing and referencing in APA style is appropriate and accurate throughout | Citing and referencing is generally appropriate and accurate. | Some errors in citing and referencing may be present | Citing and referencing is attempted, but with errors. | Referencing is consistently inaccurate or not attempted
|
1
ENS5566 Literature Review rubrics
