Knowledge production in entrepreneurship requires inclusivity as well as diversity and pluralism in
research perspectives and approaches. In this article, the authors address concerns about
interpretivist research regarding validity, reliability, objectivity, generalizability, and
communicability of results that militate against its more widespread acceptance. Following the
nonfoundationalist argument that all observation is theory-laden, context specific, and that there are
no external criteria against which to assess research design and execution and the data produced,
the authors propose that quality must be internalized within the underlying research philosophy
rather than something to be tested upon completion. This requires a shift from the notion of validity
as an outcome to validation as a process. To elucidate this, they provide a guiding framework and
present a case illustration that will assist an interpretivist entrepreneurship researcher to establish
and demonstrate the quality of their work.
For a custom-written paper on the above topic, place your order now!
What We Offer
• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level professionals
• Automatic plagiarism check
• 100% money-back guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers
