Assignment: TACC603 – Accounting Information systems

1

TACC603 – Accounting Information systems

Individual Assignment

Semester 1, 2020

Total Marks: 20% of total marks for TACC603

Due date: Friday (11:55pm, Jun 5, 2020) in week 10

Soft copy (only) of the report must be submitted to Turnitin on Moodle.

Assignment: TACC603 – Accounting Information systems

2

You are required to use the following case study and complete the tasks as per the description given below.

Case:

You and a few of your classmates decided to become entrepreneurs. You came up with a great idea for a new 3D scanning application that you think will make lots of money. Your business plan won first place in a local software competition and awarded you $10,000. You are using the $10,000 prize money to support yourselves as you start your company, but this amount will not be enough and you may need to explore other options to generate funds to help you develop the software application and have a successful business. Think through the business processes, key decisions, and information needs issues you may face.

Complete the following tasks and submit your answers as a report. Make sure to follow the requirements and report structure mentioned below under a separate heading.

Tasks:

a. Identify the key decisions you need to make to be successful entrepreneurs, the information you need to make them, and the business processes you will need to engage in.

b. Your company will need to exchange information with various external parties. Identify the external parties, and specify the information received from and sent to each of them.

c. Identify the external sources of funding and how you will approach them.

d. State and explain the security, legal and ethical issues that may arise from the

development and use of the software application?

Assignment: TACC603 – Accounting Information systems

3

Requirements & report structure

Reference sources from general websites are not acceptable.

At least six (6) credible references must be used and at least three (3) of these must be from academic (scholarly) journals. The remaining three (3) may be from industry magazines or books. The references can be from printed or online sources and must be current (i.e. within the last seven (7) years). You can use material from organisational web sites as an example to support your arguments but it is not counted towards the references’ quota (i.e., 6 references).

You are to complete the tasks listed at the end of the case study and submit your answers as a report (3000 words, excluding executive summary and reference list).

For report, create a WORD file to develop your report and include the following:

Title page (no borders or frames, required details include a suitable report title, assignment title, your name, student number, course code and title, and due date)

Executive summary (briefly describe the purpose of the report and the date on which it was requested, a brief summary of your major findings, conclusions, and recommendations.)

Table of contents (use the feature in WORD for auto generated TOC, the headings ‘Title page’, ‘Executive summary’ and ‘Table of contents’ and also the individual headings on the title page should not appear in the table of contents that is generated.)

Introduction (identify the purpose of the report and what you will be discussing within the report.)

Discussion (This is the main body of the report, after ‘Introduction’ and before ‘Conclusion’ headings. This is where you will present the arguments for your recommendations. You will need to consider headings and sub‐headings, as many as your discussion requires, between ‘Introduction’ and ‘Conclusion’, using WORD heading styles to guide your discussion to answer the tasks listed for the case study. You will need to determine in which order you present your material. You should not include the tasks, but a discussion about those issues that have been highlighted in the tasks.)

Conclusion (a very brief summary of your judgement)

Recommendations (after discussion and analysis, state explicitly what your recommendations are)

References, a complete reference list at the end of the report using Harvard referencing style

Headers (only include <Assignment title> as centred, and <page numbers> as right aligned)

Footers (only include <your student ID, LASTNAME> as left aligned, and <course code> as right aligned)

Header and footer should start from the page containing ‘Introduction’ heading.

Paragraph formatting (should be left aligned, single spaced and 6 pt space after each paragraph.)

Assignment: TACC603 – Accounting Information systems

4

Headings and sub‐headings should not be in number or bullet style.

‘Title page’ ‘Executive summary’, and ‘Table of contents’ should be on separate pages.

‘Introduction’ heading should start from a new page and after that there should not be any white space (blank line spaces) between headings.

‘References’ heading should start on a new page and references should be in alphabetical order by authors.

References, under the ‘References’ heading, should not be numbered or have bullets.

Notes:

In report, marks will be awarded based on content that constitutes your work in terms of argument development.

Avoid discussing specific hardware and software requirements.

Make any assumptions that you find necessary; however, be sure to state your assumptions within the report.

There is no correct solution for the report. It is possible for students to make different recommendations. What is crucial is that the argument presented is logical and consistent, and clearly demonstrates that the organisation’s needs are met, and that the tasks, in the case, have been addressed.

Note particularly: The work submitted must be in your own words. Lengthy quotes, even if

referenced correctly, are not considered to be your own work

Assignment: TACC603 – Accounting Information systems

5

Projects and Reports Rubric

Assessment Criteria and Performance Standards for Report

Assessment

criteria

Mark

Performance Standard

Low – Learning

outcome not

achieved

Low but some

evidence of

attainment of

required

learning

outcome

Learning

outcome

achieved as

required but

some

inaccuracies

and errors

Learning

outcome

achieved as

required with

very few

inaccuracies or

errors

Exceptional

attainment of

learning

outcome with

additional

outcomes and

information

provided

Executive

Summary and

introduction

/2

0 – 1 2 3 4 5

No clear

executive

summary and

introduction

provided

Brief executive

summary and

introduction but

incomplete and

inaccurate

Executive

summary and

introduction

provided but

could be more

concise and

clear

Clear executive

summary and

introduction

provided too

wordy

Clear, concise

and well

expressed

executive

summary and

introduction

provided

Research and

data collection

/4

0 – 1 2 3 4 5

No evident

research into

the topic

Some research

evident but little

quantifiable

research

presented

Some research

is evident but

limited citations

appropriate to

context

Adequate

secondary and

some primary

research is

evident with

supporting data

and citations

appropriate to

context

Primary and

secondary

research and

data collection is

extensive with

particularly

insighGFul

citations

Critical thinking,

analysis &

synthesis

/6

0 – 1 2 3 4 5

Very little or no

evidence of

understanding

of the topic

Some

understanding of

the topic evident

but with little

evidence of

analysis

Understanding

of the topic

evident – some

critical thinking

with analysis

and synthesis of

available

literature

Good

understanding of

the topic with

evidence of

critical thinking

with deep

analysis and

synthesis of

information

Very high level of

understanding of

the topic with

insighGFul

evaluative

comments and

conclusions

Conclusion and

recommendation

/4

0 – 1 2 3 4 5

No clear

recommendatio

n or conclusion

Provided

Brief conclusion

and

recommendation

provided but not

particularly clear

or relevant

Well

summarised but

not totally

relevant to

context

Well summarised

clear, relevant

and concise

conclusion &

recommendation

Exceptional

conclusion &

recommendation

– clear, concise

and insighGFul

0 – 1 2 3 4 5

Very poor Some evidence Structured Good structured Very good

Assignment: TACC603 – Accounting Information systems

6

Report Structure,

writing style &

grammar

/2

structure, of desired report with report with high structured with

grammatical structure with average levels level of writing very high level of

expression and low levels of of writing ability ability – clear writing ability

spelling errors writing ability with some concise with no

evident, simple spelling and expression with grammatical or

expression with grammatical few grammatical spelling errors.

many spelling and grammatical

errors

errors or spelling

inaccuracies

Referencing

/2

0 – 1 2 3 4 5

None or few

references,

citations or

appendices

Some references

but lacking in

accuracy or

proper use of a

referencing style

Appropriate

references with

use of

appendices to

support main

report but some

inaccuracies in

the use of a

referencing

style

Appropriate

references with

use of

appendices to

support main

report; very few

inaccuracies in

the use of a

referencing style

References fully

accurate and

report supported

by extensive use

of appendices

and go well

beyond

suggested by

lecturer

Total Marks

and Feedback

/20

Detailed

Comments

(these might be

directly written

on the hard

copy or

electronic copy

Areas of

improvement

Found something interesting ?

• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level professional writers
• Free Plagiarism Report

• 100% money-back guarantee
• Absolute Privacy & Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

Grab your Discount!

25% Coupon Code: SAVE25
get 25% !!