Is Machiavelli considered a keen observer of true human nature a corrupted politician a wise dignitary and leader or a necessary evil, or can you propose an alternative view ? And make sure to answer this How do you explain that Machiavelli seems to disregard religion but also disregard human agency ? use ur idead and opnion and thought! it should be ur voice so use all of the doucment that I send pls and answer then questions with ur certical thinking and ur vocie , make it an argument, and use ur ponion, and ideas, and thought about them so make sure to use ur pnion, ideasm use CERTICAL THINKING! use ur thought, ideas, exapline thme and use quotes from he tectbook and doucments that i sent, make sure use the PRINCE doucment , Make sure to use quote from the prince, Machiavelli that I send which start with p 1 the page have pic on it ( Niccolo Machiavelli the prince) next page is the PRINCE CHAPTER XVIII USE QUOTE FROM THIS, use it pls. and make sure we answer all of these quoestions, and have argument thesis.. Use simple words don’t use big words in there Make an argument thesis with 3 thing that u want talk about like leadership, religion, and humanism Write about Erasmus and Augustinians And compare Erasmus to Machiavelli, what are positive and negative about them and why , and then talk about Erasmus and Augustinians against Machiavelli, And which one was good for society ? or country ? and why ? and why not ? and even today’s society Define Erasmus and Define Machiavelli and Define Augustinians and Define Petrarch And make sure to answer this How do you explain that Machiavelli seems to disregard religion but also disregard human agency ? use ur idead and opnion and thought! it should be ur voice Is Machiavelli considered a keen observer of true human nature, a corrupted politician, a wise dignitary and leader or a necessary evil, or can you propose an alternative view ? In ur perspective are Machiavelli’s argument a legitimate justification for personal claim to power into present ? and why ?? What was Machiavelli intent in writing the prince ?? which I send What was Erasmus essentially opposing? Or what were his argument ? Is there any room for morality in politics in the efficient running of a state ? How far can a leader or ruler of a state or nation go in terms of committing atrocities om its citizens for the batterment or welfare of the nation? The end justifies the means … do you agree with this ?? or not ? and why ? As you read distinguish between Machiavelli’s ideas with WHICH U Agree and those with which u disagree, highlight agreement in one color and disagreements in another. What does Machiavelli mean that the ruler should have both fox-like and lion qualities ? In General what does Machiavelli think about the average intellect of the non rulling class? Cite evidence from the tex ‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‍ tbook which are pages 343 and 345.. What are the five qualities that the leader must “have” according to Machiavelli? Why does Machiavelli argue that a leader is better served to prented to prossess and exhibit these qulaities, rather than actually practice them? What is the life lesson, relevancy, or application that u take away from this source ? what relevance can you see of this text modern day ? Make sure to use quote from the prince, Machiavelli that I send which start with p 1 the page have pic on it ( Niccolo Machiavelli the prince) next page is the PRINCE CHAPTER XVIII USE QUOTE FROM THIS Erasmites and Augustinians: authority on Erasmus, Augustine’s confessions, and petrach’s spiritual vision of Augustine contained within Humanism ? we should use the textbook only pages 343 and 345.. no outside researchers just the book that I send and the document that I send and pls put the page number in the footnotes Make sure we answer this… Erasmus has been criticized for providing no real evidence or arguments in his writings, but rather his assertions are made without any justification, only presented as evident truths and explanations. What do you have to say about this ? can we just take matters and form our ideas based on faith ? do we need evidential truths and reasoning to justify our mystical or personal experiences of the spiritual? Despite this limitation, how can u validate Erasmus as a figure of authority on the subject ? On the education of a Christian prince and Machiavelli: why does an education for Erasmus, what is difference between personal power and power for the people? What is the usefulness and place of religion in everyday life? Is there room for religion in the Renaissance material world? Why is the idea of virtue important to living out our humanity ? does man not have a natural tendency and propensity towards evil and then how can this be prevented? What does Erasmus and Augustine say to Machiavelli? no summary. make a point, use evidence which means use quote from the page, and give an opinion. We must USE our ideas and thought and opinion, our voice.. other ways the prof will give a zero and you can do this by making a clear point. We should explain more and use more our opinion not only the book what says in there more our thought and pls use small words not big words.??other ways we will get a zero and if we write any summary we will get zero too, and when u are using quote pls put the page number and it should be matched with the book.??No summary, make a point, use evidence which means use quote from the page, and give an opinion. should be your ideas and you can do this by making a clear point? 1. Reade the Machiavelli’s arguments made in prince and Erasmus and then primary documents 2. How would you connect Erasmus to the time of Renaissance? 3. AND HOW you will support it by providing its meaning? 4. Read the Renaissance Prince: The views of Machiavelli and Erasmus compare them. The good and bad thing about both mostly Erasmus Have ur thought, opinion, write in ur voice 5. Extracts of Erasmus, Edu ‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‍ cation of Christian Prince.