#Sales Offer!| Get upto 25% Off:

 

Consider heat transfer through a double-pane window as shown in Figure 7.31a. Two layers of glass with thermal conductivity kare separated by a layer of stagnant air with thermal conductivity k2. The inner surface of the window is at temperature T1 and exposed to room air with heat transfer coefficient h1. The outer surface of the wall is at temperature T2 and exposed to air with heat transfer coefficient h2. Assume that k= 0.95 W/(m・°C),

k2 = 0.0285 W/(m・°C), hh2 = 10 W/(m2・°C), T1 = 20°C, and T2 = 35°C. The thickness of each glass layer is 4 mm, the thickness of the air layer is 8 mm, and the cross-sectional area

of the window is 1.5 m2.

a. Determine the heat flow rate through the double-pane window.

b. Determine the temperature distribution through the double-pane window.

c. Repeat Parts (a) and (b) for the single-pane glass window shown in Figure 7.31b.

Found something interesting ?

• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level professional writers
• Free Plagiarism Report

• 100% money-back guarantee
• Absolute Privacy & Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

Related Model Questions

Feel free to peruse our college and university model questions. If any our our assignment tasks interests you, click to place your order. Every paper is written by our professional essay writers from scratch to avoid plagiarism. We guarantee highest quality of work besides delivering your paper on time.

First read the reports of the three other teams that participated in PharmaSim (in Doc Sharing area). Then write a quick summary of each team’s strategy (INCLUDING your own). Finally, compare and contrast your team’s strategy with the other three groups’ and identify improvements for each (yours and theirs). I have attached the two douments needed TeamB is my team and the other document has all teams in succession Note: Again, you must read the reports carefully here is example: The strategy for Group B was to advance Allround’s brand by adding a line extension. Based on Allround’s great brand awareness and the belief that there was a market for a children’s cough liquid, Group B introduced Allround +. Group A had a similar thought process but arrived at a different conclusion. Although there is a market for medicine specifically targeted towards children, we could not ignore the cough and allergy market. Our long term strategy was to introduce the unique non-drowsy allergy capsule while our short term strategy was to capture some of the cough market. Group B marketed their line extension to compare to Coughcure. Group A chose not to go this route because we would not have any competitors when we introduced our unique allergy product, Allright. I do think it was it was a good idea for Group B to add a line extension and looking back on the simulation, Group A wishes they would have added one. However, I think it would have been more effective to introduce the 4-hour cough liquid instead of the children’s cough medicine. Group A and B also had different advertising strategies. When Group B introduced their new line extension, the advertising budget was $6 million while Group A budgeted $15 million for the introduction of our new product. Since Group B was introducing a line extension and not a whole new product, it makes sense that the advertising budget was lower, however, I think Group B would have benefited from an increase in their advertising budget for at least the first period. Group B also put a lot of emphasis on advertising the benefits of their product messaging. Since their product did not have a unique benefit, I think it would have been more valuable to place more emphasis on comparison. Similar to Group A, Group B struggled with sales force in the beginning of the simulation and greatly benefited from purchasing the sales force report to compare their sales force numbers to the competition.

Read More »

Grab your Discount!

25% Coupon Code: SAVE25
get 25% !!