Complete a written (approx 1500 words) literature review about water flooding for enhancing oil recovery.
For your report you should follow the below structure:
Summary: Provide a brief summary about the topic and its importance (100-150 words).
Introduction: Introduce the topic/problem and the context within which it is found. ( 300-400 words)
Body: provide the details of your topic and support your text by referring to the relevant literature. Provide the importance, advantages and disadvantages, developments and gaps, etc. (about 1000 words)
Conclusion: conclude your report and highlight the findings (100-150 words)
References
Report Assessment Rubric (Literature review):
CRITERIA | High Distinction (80-100) | Distinction (70-79) | Credit (60-69) | Pass (50-59) | Fail (0-49) |
Understanding
(40%) |
Insightful response that reflects a sophisticated interpretation of the literature reviewed. | Response that reflects a good understanding and interpretation of the literature reviewed. | Response that reflects an understanding and interpretation of the literature reviewed. | Satisfactory response that reflects a basic understanding and interpretation of the literature reviewed. | Response is unsatisfactory and does not show an understanding or interpretation of the literature reviewed. |
Use of evidence
(20%) |
Analysis and evaluation of a range of relevant, reputable scholarly literature is well-integrated to enrich response. | Analysis and evaluation of a range of relevant, reputable scholarly literature is used to support response. | Analysis and evaluation of some relevant, reputable scholarly literature is used to support response. | Reference to relevant, reputable scholarly literature is present but limited. | Reference to relevant, reputable scholarly literature is lacking or not evident. |
Structure and style
(15%)
|
Logically organised introduction, body and conclusion that flows easily. Sophisticated and complex style appropriate for a literature review. | Clearly organised introduction, body and conclusion that flows well. Style is appropriate for a literature review. | Organised introduction, body and conclusion that generally flows well. Style is generally appropriate for a literature review. | Contains introduction, body and conclusion. Style show a basic understanding of a literature review. | Lacks appropriate structure and flow, and may be difficult to follow. Overall, style is inappropriate for a literature review. |
Technical skills
(15%)
|
Uses varied and complex sentence structure. Almost error-free punctuation and grammar. A wide-range of highly appropriate vocabulary and discipline-specific terms. | Uses varied sentence structure. Occasional errors in punctuation and grammar. A range of appropriate and accurate discipline-specific vocabulary. | Produces mostly error free sentences. Infrequent errors in spelling and punctuation which do not impede understanding. Uses vocabulary and discipline-specific terms accurately. | Produces sentences with some variety and accuracy. Errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar occasionally impede understanding. Mostly appropriate vocabulary and key discipline-specific terms. | Produces sentences which are repetitive, simplistic, incomplete or run-on. Errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation that interfere with understanding. Limited/inappropriate vocabulary; discipline-specific terms misused/ missing. |
Referencing
(10%) |
Citing and referencing in APA style is appropriate and accurate throughout | Citing and referencing is generally appropriate and accurate. | Some errors in citing and referencing may be present | Citing and referencing is attempted, but with errors. | Referencing is consistently inaccurate or not attempted
|
Please aim for HIGH DISTINCTION.
Things you need to know:
Steps you need to follow:
Firstly:
Secondly:
Step 3:
Step 4:
How to write the intro:
Step 5:
How to write the body:
Example:
Step 5:
How to write the conclusion:
Lastly:
Reference:
Refer to the rubric in page 2 for the style of referencing.
1
ENS5566 Literature Review rubrics