what justification did the court offer regarding a regulation that would exclude boys from participating on girls’ teams, even though girls would be permitted to participate on boys’ teams?

In Williams v. School District of Bethlehem, PA, 998 F.2d 168 (3d. Cir. 1993), a boy asserted his right to participate on the girl’s field hockey team. In a decision that dealt with Title IX (whether field hockey is a contact sport that would justify his exclusion) and constitutional issues, including a challenge under the state equal rights amendment, the court remanded the case for the trial court to determine whether there were physical differences between girls and boys that would justify excluding the boy. The appellate court directed the trial court to examine whether “boys are more likely to dominate the school’s athletic program if admitted to the girls’ teams.” In Force, what justification did the court offer regarding a regulation that would exclude boys from participating on girls’ teams, even though girls would be permitted to participate on boys’ teams? Do you agree with the court’s reasoning?

find the cost of your paper

Identify at least two myths discussed in this unit, who perpetrates the myths you identified, and why these are important to understand.

In this presentation, you will explain corrections. Please include the following in your presentation: a short summary of corrections. Please include the following items in your response. a) Corrections: This….

complete the Module 6 Assessment Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement

Global Health Comparison Grid Template Use this document to complete the Module 6 Assessment Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement Global Healthcare Issue Description Country United States Describe the policy….