ENEG20001 Australian Engineering Practice
Term 1, 2019
Individual Reflective Paper 3 [10 Marks]
6. Lead or participate collaboratively in a team (500 – 700 words)
Explain a situation where you have had to collaborate and teach a team. This might be in any situation like sports, study, works in industry, etc. Explain your contribution and collaborative principle. What could be the problems and advantages?
7. Demonstrate critical self-review, self-management and lifelong learning XXXXXXXXXXwords)
Summarise key changes that you believe you would need to make to your work behaviours to be a more effective engineer in your country or in another country where you might be doing engineering. Demonstrate and explain your critical self-review, self-management and lifelong learning process.
| Criteria |
| 1. Reflection |
| 2. Concepts |
| 3. Presentation and language |
| 4. Referencing |
Note that writing tasks must be deemed acceptable if they are to be used as evidence in the Portfolio. If a writing task is deemed not acceptable, you should discuss how you might improve your submission with your facilitator.
Feedback
| Writing task | Comments |
| 6 | |
| 7 |
ENEG20001 Australian Engineering Practice
Term 1, 2019
Individual Reflective Paper 3 [10 Marks]
Lead or participate collaboratively in a team (500 – 700 words)
Explain a situation where you have had to collaborate and teach a team. This might be in any situation like sports, study, works in industry, etc. Explain your contribution and collaborative principle. What could be the problems and advantages?
Demonstrate critical self-review, self-management and lifelong learning (500 – 700 words)
Summarise key changes that you believe you would need to make to your work behaviours to be a more effective engineer in your country or in another country where you might be doing engineering. Demonstrate and explain your critical self-review, self-management and lifelong learning process.
| Criteria | Acceptable |
| 1. Reflection | Reflection shows the student has considered ‘What, So what, What else, What now’ |
| 2. Concepts | Shows good understanding of concepts as presented in the textbook. |
| 3. Presentation and language | Neatly presented with appropriate headings. Language, grammar and spelling are suitable.
The intent of the writing is clear. Sentences flow logically. |
| 4. Referencing | Includes in-text citations and reference list where appropriate, including referencing textbook.
Any sources used are reliable. Harvard referencing style is used. |
Note that writing tasks must be deemed acceptable if they are to be used as evidence in the Portfolio. If a writing task is deemed not acceptable, you should discuss how you might improve your submission with your facilitator.
Feedback
| Writing task | Acceptable | Comments |
| 6 | Yes/ No | |
| 7 | Yes/ No |
