Study the Disciplinary procedure/practices of a government/private sector company in Oman and write a report critically analysing their present Disciplinary procedure/practices March 26, 2015 Read More »
Most managers have an alienating tendency towards employee discipline and often end up with different coping mechanisms. The variations in the discipline practices within the organisation could be due improper design of the disciplinary system. Lack of discipline can cause losses in employee productivity and bring in conflicts, which will have a serious repercussions on the organisation’s performance. The need of the hour is to design a formal and structured disciplinary system that will facilitate the overall performance of the organisation March 26, 2015 Read More »
Do you think the Method (section 4) that Emsley (2005) has adopted for his study is adequate/not adequate for the research in terms of strengths or weakness of the study, and how it can be made better? March 26, 2015 Read More »
Emsley (2005) suggests that acceptance of innovations by business unit managers and incentives to innovate are some of the keys features of role involvement¡¯s effect on innovativeness. Do you agree/not agree with Emsley (2005) suggestions? Explain your reasons March 26, 2015 Read More »
You are required to analyze the literature review and explain why Emsley (2005) is emphasizing on Theory Development (section 3) in the framework for management accounting innovation March 26, 2015 Read More »
Bruce is a 69 year old retired gentleman. He lives at home with his wife Betty, and together they have three adult children. Bruce is a Vietnam veteran, and as a consequence of his active duty during the war he has developed severe post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. He suffers with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, but has repeatedly declined any treatment for any of these conditions. Bruce also has a lump on the right underside of his chin that is about the size of a golf ball. Bruce’s wife reports that this lump had been present for many months but despite the fact that it has turned into an open wound with an offensive exudate, Bruce had refuses to seek treatment for it. In recent weeks Bruce has developed symptoms suggestive of an infective illness. He has complained of generalised malaise, muscle aches and pains and an elevated temperature with occasional rigors. Despite the best efforts of Betty and the children, Bruce has refused to seek medical attention for these symptoms even as his condition deteriorated. Eventually Bruce became so weak and dehydrated that he was no longer able to refuse Betty’s efforts to have him see a doctor; with the assistance of their children Betty manoeuvred him into the car and took him to hospital. On admission to the hospital Bruce was noted to be hypotensive, tachycardic and febrile. His level of consciousness fluctuated, and was often only minimally responsive. Concerned that he may not be able to adequately protect his airway, Bruce was transferred to the high dependency unit where he could be closely monitored. Bruce was diagnosed with septicaemia resulting from the open wound under his chin March 26, 2015 Read More »
Bruce is a 69 year old retired gentleman. He lives at home with his wife Betty, and together they have three adult children. Bruce is a Vietnam veteran, and as a consequence of his active duty during the war he has developed severe post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. He suffers with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, but has repeatedly declined any treatment for any of these conditions. Bruce also has a lump on the right underside of his chin that is about the size of a golf ball. Bruce’s wife reports that this lump had been present for many months but despite the fact that it has turned into an open wound with an offensive exudate, Bruce had refuses to seek treatment for it March 26, 2015 Read More »
The doctrine of vicarious liability lies at the heart of all civil and law systems of tort law. It represents not a tort, but a rule of responsibility which renders the defendant liable for the torts committed by another. The classic case is that of employer and employee: the employer is rendered strictly liable for the torts of his employees, provided that they are committed in the course of the tortfeasor’s employment. In such cases, liability is imposed on the employer, not because of his own wrongful act, but due to his relationship with the tortfeasor. The claimant is thus presented with two potential defendants: the individual tortfeasor and a third party, likely to be with means and/or insured and usually clearly identifiable in circumstances where it may be difficult to identify the actual culprit in question March 26, 2015 Read More »
What legal and ethical justifications for the doctrine of vicarious liability can you identify? How many are appropriate in the modern world? March 26, 2015 Read More »
The paper must be about the following three female photographers from the 1930s, Dorothea Lange, Charlotte Brooks, and Louise Rosskam March 26, 2015 Read More »